Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 M365X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro T2000 mobile stacks up against Radeon R7 M365X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 7000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Litho |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs GRID K220Q
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M