Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 5500M and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 5500M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 5500M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 11000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro 5500M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Radeon Pro 5500M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Litho |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 November 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |