Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 182 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 September 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |