Radeon R7 M270 vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M270 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal XT / Mars | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | + |
| PowerTune | + | + |
| DualGraphics | + | + |
| ZeroCore | + | + |
| Switchable graphics | + | + |
| Mantle | + | + |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |