Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon R9 M395
When choosing between Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R9 M395, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R9 M395.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R9 M395 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon R7 M365X is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M365X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 66 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R9 M395 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 250 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Litho | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 | |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | + | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | + |
| HD3D | + | + |
| PowerTune | + | + |
| DualGraphics | + | + |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | + |
| Switchable graphics | + | + |
| Mantle | + | + |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |