Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When choosing between Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon RX 460 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M365X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon RX 460 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon R7 M365X is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M365X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 457% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Litho | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 | 66.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |