Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M365X will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M365X is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M365X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Litho | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 May 2015 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 690 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.04 | |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Quadro K4000M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs FirePro M5100
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K4000M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs FirePro M5100