Radeon R7 M365X vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M365X and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M365X will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M365X
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Radeon R7 M365X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R7 M365X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2132 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
10−11
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
40−45
100−110
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
9−10
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
7−8
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
2−3
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
3−4
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
2−3
30−35
medium / 1080p
2−3
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
7−8
60−65
medium / 768p
6−7
35−40
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M365X
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Litho
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
5 May 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
900 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
Transistor count
690 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
23.04
32.14
Floating-point performance
737.3 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
Not Listed
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Compute units
6
Check Price
