Radeon R7 M365X vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When comparing Radeon R7 M365X and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 M365X and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Radeon R7 M365X

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Radeon R7 M365X	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

Radeon R7 M365X is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Radeon R7 M365X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	30−33
medium / 1080p	2−3	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Radeon R7 M365X and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	200−210
medium / 768p	85−90	170−180
ultra / 1080p	35−40	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	10−11	24−27
high / 768p	60−65	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	40−45	90−95
ultra / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	95−100
medium / 1080p	7−8	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	5−6	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	40−45	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	27−30
medium / 1080p	2−3	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	7−8	50−55
medium / 768p	6−7	30−35
high / 1080p	3−4	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
high / 768p	30−33	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	Radeon R7 M365X	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Litho	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015	15 August 2020
Pipelines	384	96
Core clock speed	900 MHz
Boost Clock	825 MHz
Transistor count	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	23.04
Floating-point performance	737.3 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX		DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed
FreeSync	+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Eyefinity	+
HD3D	+
PowerTune	+
DualGraphics	+
ZeroCore	+
Switchable graphics	+
Mantle	+
Quick Sync		+
Compute units	6
		Check Price

Radeon R7 M365X vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares