Radeon R7 M365X vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
When comparing Radeon R7 M365X and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R7 M365X and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M365X
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M365X | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M365X is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M365X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 600 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M365X | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Litho | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 May 2015 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 690 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.04 | |
Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GRID K220Q
- Radeon R7 M365X vs GeForce GT 640M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GRID K220Q
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Radeon R7 M365X vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640