GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R7 M370
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R7 M370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M370.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 367 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Litho |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |