GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R7 M370
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 M370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 425 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF104 | Litho |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 70 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |