GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M370
When comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 130 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 84% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M370. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK104 | Litho |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 875 MHz |
Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |