GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M370
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M370, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M370.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M370 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 130 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M370. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK104 | Litho |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 875 MHz |
Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | 70 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |