GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon R7 M370
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M370.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 153 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 4012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Litho |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |