Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 M370
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 M370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Fortnite is 36% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF106 | Litho |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 70 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |