Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 3800 stacks up against Radeon R7 M370, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 275 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 433% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M370 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Litho |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |