Radeon R7 M380 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 M380 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 M380 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R7 M380 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M380 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M380 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M380 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M380 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M380.
- Radeon R7 M380 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M380 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M380 is 341 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R7 M380 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1988 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M380.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M380. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M380 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Tropo | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,171 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |