FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 M460

In this comparison between FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 M460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4300 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Radeon R7 M460 Check Price

Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:

Radeon R7 M460 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 M460
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M460.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 54 MHz higher, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 and Radeon R7 M460 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	5−6
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	24−27	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	35−40	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	50−55	10−11
medium / 768p	30−35	8−9
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M460.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M460.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Radeon R7 M460
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN
Code name	Bonaire	Meso
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2015	21 February 2016
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	930 MHz	984 MHz
Boost Clock		1125 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64	27.00
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops	864.0 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R7 M460

Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares