GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 M460
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M460 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 312 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M460 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Check Price |