GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R7 M460
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 M460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R7 M460.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R7 M460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M460 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 316 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M460 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M460. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R7 M460 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF104 | Meso |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 21 February 2016 |
Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 984 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |