GRID K520 vs Radeon R7 M460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K520
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M460.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 239 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 and Radeon R7 M460 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |