Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 M460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Radeon R7 M460, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M460 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 317 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M460 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |