Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R7 M460
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon R7 M460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 411 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M460 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon R7 M460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Code name | TU117 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Check Price |