FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R7 M465
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M465, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M465 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M465 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 75 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | Litho XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |