GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 M465
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 108% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |