GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon R7 M465
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M465, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M6 8Q stacks up against Radeon R7 M465, check out specs charts below.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 103 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |