Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 M465
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 M465, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 2000D stacks up against Radeon R7 M465, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M465 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 1400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Fortnite is 31% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF106 | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |