Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M465
In this comparison between Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M or Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 3000M
Radeon R7 M465
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 3375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
21−24
24−27
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
high / 768p
65−70
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
Quadro 3000M and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Fortnite is 31% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
9−10
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
80−85
70−75
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
8−9
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
10−11
20−22
medium / 768p
8−9
12−14
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 3000M
Radeon R7 M465
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Code name
Fermi
Litho XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
22 February 2011
1 January 2017
Pipelines
240
384
Core clock speed
450 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
960 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
18.00
27.00
Floating-point performance
432.0 gflops
864.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
