Quadro 6000 vs Radeon R7 M465

When comparing Quadro 6000 and Radeon R7 M465, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 6000 and Radeon R7 M465 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro 6000 Check Price

Radeon R7 M465 Check Price

Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:

Radeon R7 M465 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 6000	Radeon R7 M465
Power consumption (TDP)	204 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 6000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro 6000 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
Quadro 6000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
Quadro 6000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 251 MHz higher, than Quadro 6000.
Quadro 6000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 1012 MHz higher, than Quadro 6000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	21−24	8−9
ultra / 1080p	18−20	6−7
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	45−50	21−24
medium / 1080p	24−27	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 6000 and Radeon R7 M465 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	100−110
ultra / 1080p	90−95	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	130−140	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	90−95	60−65
medium / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	80−85	50−55
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	27−30	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	9−10
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	8−9
medium / 1080p	14−16	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	50−55	20−22
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	16−18	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M465.
low / 768p	100−105	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R7 M465.

Full Specs

	Quadro 6000	Radeon R7 M465
Architecture	Fermi	GCN
Code name	GF100	Litho XT
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	10 December 2010	1 January 2017
Pipelines	448	384
Core clock speed	574 MHz	825 MHz
Boost Clock		960 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	32.14	27.00
Floating-point performance	1,027.7 gflops	864.0 gflops
Length	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2988 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.4 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	91 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 6000 vs Radeon R7 M465

Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares