Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M465
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R7 M465 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M465 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |