Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R7 M465
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon R7 M465, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro T1000 stacks up against Radeon R7 M465, check out specs charts below.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 570 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R7 M465. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN |
Code name | TU117 | Litho XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 1 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 960 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |