Radeon E8860 vs Radeon R7 M465
In this comparison between Radeon E8860 and Radeon R7 M465 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon E8860 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon E8860 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon E8860 and Radeon R7 M465 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon E8860 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Radeon E8860 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 250 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon E8860 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Venus | Litho XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 January 2014 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |