Radeon R7 M465 vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R7 M465 and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R7 M465 and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M465 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M465 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- Radeon R7 M465 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M465 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 1012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M465 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Litho XT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |