Radeon R7 M465 vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M465 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M465 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M465 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M465 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- Radeon R7 M465 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M465 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 268 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R7 M465 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 616% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 563% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 733% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 516% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 286% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 442% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 611% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R7 M465. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M465 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Litho XT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 960 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |