FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R7 M465X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M465X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M465X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M465X
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 34% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 28% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |