FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R7 M465X
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 M465X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 M465X.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 177 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 103% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |