GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R7 M465X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760M stacks up against Radeon R7 M465X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M465X
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 243 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14E-GL | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 657 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |