GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon R7 M465X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 M465X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 M465X.
Radeon R7 M465X
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 765M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14-GE | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |