GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 129 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 193% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 172% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 171% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tropo | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2x 1870 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |