GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R7 M465X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M465X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M465X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M465X
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 44 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 103% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |