GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 M465X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K280Q
Radeon R7 M465X
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 37% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Tropo |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |