Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 6100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 40% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |