Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R7 M465X
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 M465X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 M465X.
Radeon R7 M465X
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |