Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 M465X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M465X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs stacks up against Radeon R7 M465X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 172% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 122% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 171% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 96 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R7 M465X vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs FirePro W5130M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M360
- Radeon R7 M465X vs FirePro W5130M
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 M360