Quadro M2000M vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 138 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 87% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |