Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 Max Q and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 Max Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 105 MHz higher, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 Max Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |