Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T2000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Tropo |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs FirePro W5130M
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 M360
- Radeon R7 M465X vs FirePro W5130M
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 M360