Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 M395
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M465X and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M465X will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M465X | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- Radeon R7 M465X is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M465X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 66 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Radeon R7 M465X and Radeon R9 M395 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 3250 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M465X | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Tropo | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 May 2016 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |