FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R8 M365DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R8 M365DX.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 230 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Pitcairn | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 3 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |